05:08, October 28 70 0 theguardian.com

2018-10-28 05:08:05
Philip Green: 'There was banter but I meant no offence'

The Topshop boss, Sir Philip Green, has rejected allegations of racial abuse and sexual harassment of staff, insisting there had only been “some banter” and he never meant to cause offence.

After he was named in parliament as the businessman at the centre of the #MeToo claims, Green complained he had been used for “target practice”.

In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, he described the past days as a “horror story” and said the furore was “injuring” his business.

On Thursday, the former Labour cabinet minister Peter Hain used parliamentary privilege to name the retail tycoon as the individual behind a legal injunction preventing the Daily Telegraph publishing “confidential information” from five employees.

Green, who is staying in a health resort in Tucson, Arizona, acknowledged that during his years in business he had engaged in “some banter” but said there was never any intent to be offensive.

“I’m very, very upset. I’m being used as target practice. It’s injuring my business, all the people potentially working in the business, and it’s injuring me and my family,” he said.

“It’s a horror story. Somebody can say whatever they like and people just follow you around, chasing you and harassing you. “I’ve been in business for more than 40 years. There has obviously from time to time been some banter and a bit of humour, but as far as I’m concerned there was never any intent to be offensive.

Green added that he believed he had a good relationship with staff and said that he had never previously faced complaints.

“If anything I’ve said has caused offence, I’m happy to apologise,” he said. “Nothing I’ve said was ever meant to be offensive.”

Green has said he intends to lodge a formal complaint with the House of Lords authorities over Lord Hain for failing to declare he was a paid adviser to the law firm representing the Telegraph when he made his intervention.

Hain said he was unaware that the firm, Gordon Dadds, was involved in the case when he spoke and dismissed Green’s allegation as a “malevolent diversion”.

“I stand resolutely by what I’ve said and neither retract nor apologise for standing up for human rights,” he told the Press Association.

Hain has been criticised by some lawyers and legal experts for what they say was an abuse of parliamentary privilege, although he has been backed by many MPs.

Topics